IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curtis Abbott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — CCHL 34 7 10 17 0.500 0.1427 0.1392 0.3871 0.3775
2019-20 — OJHL 35 14 17 31 0.886 0.2475 0.2475 0.6112 0.6112
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 24 6 12 18 0.750
2022-23 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 24 9 9 18 0.750
2021-22 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 22 6 9 15 0.682
2020-21 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25273
Forward overall
#1048
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Palmiscno
St. John's · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy Taylor
Castleton · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Dunleavy
Bowdoin · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.