IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaleb Kinskey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 15 13 28 0.636 0.2098 0.2091 0.2165 0.2157
2019-20 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 31 14 14 28 0.903 0.2977 0.2977 0.3073 0.3073
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC GR 22 4 2 6 0.273
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 25 7 2 9 0.360
2021-22 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 16 1 0 1 0.062
2020-21 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19742
Forward overall
#969
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Schmidbauer
Salve Regina · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Sabin
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Pratt
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.