IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaleb Kinskey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 15 13 28 0.636 0.0832 0.0829 0.2160 0.2152
2019-20 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 31 14 14 28 0.903 0.1181 0.1181 0.3065 0.3065
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC GR 22 4 2 6 0.273
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 25 7 2 9 0.360
2021-22 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 16 1 0 1 0.062
2020-21 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20079
Forward overall
#990
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Schmidbauer
Salve Regina · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan O'Donnell
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aiden Moser
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.