IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Slagter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Willmar High USHS-MN 18 0 2 2 0.111 0.0141 0.0149 0.0270 0.0286
2017-18 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 44 3 8 11 0.250 0.0319 0.0327 0.0791 0.0812
2018-19 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 47 18 21 39 0.830 0.1057 0.1029 0.2625 0.2556
2019-20 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 40 16 22 38 0.950 0.1210 0.1210 0.3005 0.3005
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 21 2 2 4 0.191
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2021-22 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 14 1 1 2 0.143
2020-21 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32682
Forward overall
#1769
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will O'Neill
Worcester State · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Roe
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Swanson
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.