IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Tomaso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pomfret NE-Prep 30 9 24 33 1.100 0.2179 0.2179 0.5012 0.5012
2019-20 Pomfret NE-Prep 28 9 10 19 0.679 0.1344 0.1344 0.3092 0.3092
2020-21 South Shore Kings NCDC 17 6 7 13 0.765 0.3118 0.3118 0.6147 0.6147
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 30 6 13 19 0.633
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 25 5 16 21 0.840
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 25 6 13 19 0.760
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
78%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12384
Forward overall
#525
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zac Boyle
Neumann · 2014-15
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Parent
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Love
Neumann · 2006-07
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.