IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tiger Bjornlund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 37 6 12 18 0.486 0.0712 0.0739 0.2383 0.2474
2019-20 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 35 6 20 26 0.743 0.1088 0.1088 0.3639 0.3639
2020-21 Boston Dukes EHL 7 0 3 3 0.429 0.0627 0.0627 0.2099 0.2099
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2022-23 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 14 2 2 4 0.286
2020-21 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
78%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5559
Defenseman overall
#1163
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Roll
Amherst · 2010-11
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Tavare
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Worrell
Roger Williams · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.