IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Cronkhite Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 40 1 7 8 0.200 0.0226 0.0232 0.0679 0.0698
2018-19 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 42 2 14 16 0.381 0.0430 0.0419 0.1293 0.1261
2019-20 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 44 0 8 8 0.182 0.0205 0.0205 0.0617 0.0617
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 23 0 2 2 0.087
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 27 1 1 2 0.074
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 23 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20017
Defenseman overall
#3033
Defenseman born in 1999
#5459
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Morris
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Nelson
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marcus Andersson
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.