IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Andersson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-12 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Almtuna IS · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 MoDo Hockey U20 SHL-J20 38 4 12 16 0.421 0.2326 0.2320 0.5609 0.5594
2013-14 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 44 5 10 15 0.341 0.1883 0.1787 0.4541 0.4309
2018-19 Almtuna IS Allsvenskan 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 24 3 6 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2014-15 · Fredonia
+119.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27268
Forward overall
#1050
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Ochterbeck
Curry · 2016-17
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Adkins
Concordia (WI) · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Christy
New England · 2017-18
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.