IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Aonso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Brampton Capitals OJHL 46 5 11 16 0.348 0.0852 0.0831 0.2381 0.2321
2004-05 Brampton Capitals OJHL 49 11 20 31 0.633 0.1551 0.1434 0.4331 0.4004
2005-06 — OJHL 47 10 20 30 0.638 0.1564 0.1388 0.4369 0.3878
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Fredonia D3 — SR 25 6 24 30 1.200
2008-09 Fredonia D3 — JR 23 4 9 13 0.565
2007-08 Fredonia D3 — SO 27 2 3 5 0.185
2006-07 Fredonia D3 — FR 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2006-07 · Fredonia
+46.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32863
Forward overall
#1010
Forward born in 1985
#1855
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Whitehead
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Murphy
Rivier · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Zepeda
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.