IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

E.J. Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 38 10 14 24 0.632 0.0826 0.0818 0.2144 0.2124
2019-20 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 41 15 28 43 1.049 0.1372 0.1372 0.3560 0.3560
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17128
Forward overall
#826
Forward born in 1999
#1063
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinnie Jacona
UMass Boston · 2005-06
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Garlasco
Babson · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Heppner
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.