IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Anton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHLP 43 9 16 25 0.581 0.0667 0.0669 0.1310 0.1315
2018-19 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 36 3 4 7 0.194 0.0449 0.0454 0.0951 0.0962
2019-20 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 39 5 9 14 0.359 0.0470 0.0470 0.1218 0.1218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 17 1 0 1 0.059
2022-23 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46792
Forward overall
#2721
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan White
Stonehill · 2017-18
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Valiquette
Nichols · 2016-17
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg McGunigle
Amherst · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.