IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Meyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 44 16 16 32 0.727 0.0542 0.0528 0.1666 0.1623
2018-19 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 44 27 21 48 1.091 0.0813 0.0755 0.2498 0.2320
2019-20 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 42 18 17 35 0.833 0.0940 0.0940 0.2829 0.2829
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Becker D3 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26068
Forward overall
#1322
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake McAlpine
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jed McGlasson
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2008-09
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Kull
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.