IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Whim Stålberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-14 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Karlskrona HK U20 SuperElit 18 1 2 3 0.167 0.0658 0.0658 0.2264 0.2264
2018-19 Karlskrona HK U20 SuperElit 43 15 25 40 0.930 0.3671 0.3492 1.2633 1.2018
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 46 8 26 34 0.739 0.3013 0.3013 0.5941 0.5941
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast — 25 9 6 15 0.600
2020-21 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7181
Forward overall
#303
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Fawcett
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Louie Kamienski
Endicott · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Maucieri
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.