IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donnie Feldman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Albany Academy NE-Prep 27 3 6 9 0.333 0.0643 0.0643 0.1525 0.1525
2019-20 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0231 0.0231 0.0809 0.0809
2020-21 New England Wolves EHL 30 22 19 41 1.367 0.1999 0.1999 0.6701 0.6701
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 25 13 6 19 0.760
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 16 6 0 6 0.375
2022-23 Arcadia D3 MAC SO 25 4 5 9 0.360
2021-22 Arcadia D3 MAC FR 17 4 4 8 0.471
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2021-22 · Arcadia
+755.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20190
Forward overall
#902
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Beau Depencier
Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bestwick
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Morton
Fredonia · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.