IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Parrott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Soo Eagles NOJHL 51 1 10 11 0.216 0.0307 0.0331 0.0895 0.0964
2019-20 Soo Eagles NOJHL 52 0 7 7 0.135 0.0192 0.0192 0.0558 0.0558
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 42 2 11 13 0.309 0.0349 0.0349 0.1053 0.1053
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 24 0 1 1 0.042
2022-23 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 17 1 3 4 0.235
2021-22 Arcadia D3 MAC SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2021-22 · Arcadia
+797.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22477
Defenseman overall
#3254
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Savage
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devlin McCabe
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Yoon
Bethel · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Kundinger
Beloit · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.