| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Philadelphia Jr. Flyers | EHLP | 44 | 28 | 32 | 60 | 1.364 | 0.2574 | 0.2722 | 0.3071 | 0.3247 |
| 2018-19 | Philadelphia Jr. Flyers | EHL | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Richmond Generals | USPHL-Premier | 44 | 35 | 31 | 66 | 1.500 | 0.4944 | 0.4944 | 0.5103 | 0.5103 |
| 2020-21 | Richmond Generals | USPHL-Premier | 44 | 24 | 38 | 62 | 1.409 | 0.4644 | 0.4644 | 0.4794 | 0.4794 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | SR | 30 | 9 | 22 | 31 | 1.033 |
| 2023-24 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | JR | 28 | 12 | 17 | 29 | 1.036 |
| 2022-23 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | SO | 22 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.773 |
| 2021-22 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | FR | 11 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.636 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.