← New Search ↗ Social Card

Richard Boyce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-09-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Cornwall Colts CCHL 49 3 7 10 0.204 0.0443 0.0451 0.1580 0.1607
2003-04 Cornwall Colts CCHL 6 1 3 4 0.667 0.1446 0.1398 0.5161 0.4990
2004-05 Brampton Capitals OJHL 47 11 27 38 0.808 0.1982 0.1798 0.5534 0.5021
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Fredonia D3 SR 24 3 5 8 0.333
2007-08 Fredonia D3 JR 27 10 7 17 0.630
2006-07 Fredonia D3 SO 25 1 3 4 0.160
2005-06 Fredonia D3 FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2005-06 · Fredonia
+42.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33150
Forward overall
#939
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.