← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Figueroa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 37 11 9 20 0.540 0.0707 0.0729 0.1834 0.1891
2018-19 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 40 20 20 40 1.000 0.1308 0.1279 0.3394 0.3319
2019-20 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 44 21 29 50 1.136 0.1486 0.1486 0.3857 0.3857
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC 17 3 1 4 0.235
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC 13 4 0 4 0.308
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC 17 2 2 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2021-22 · Buffalo State
+159.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14729
Forward overall
#687
Forward born in 1999
#825
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2018-19
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.