IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Fleming Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Wellington Dukes OJHL 44 3 10 13 0.295 0.0724 0.0777 0.2035 0.2185
2005-06 Wellington Dukes OJHL 49 15 31 46 0.939 0.2301 0.2386 0.6464 0.6703
2006-07 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 28 40 68 1.417 0.3472 0.3426 0.9754 0.9626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 32 13 18 31 0.969
2009-10 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 32 22 17 39 1.219
2008-09 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 31 13 12 25 0.806
2007-08 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 32 6 5 11 0.344
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2007-08 · Dartmouth
+33.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15838
Forward overall
#597
Forward born in 1988
#523
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Sanzone
Colby · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonah Alexander
Hobart · 2018-19
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Miller
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.