← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Snyder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Oswego Stampede NA3HL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.0637 0.0679 0.1582 0.1685
2018-19 Oswego Stampede NA3HL 44 11 24 35 0.795 0.1013 0.1026 0.2516 0.2548
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 34 19 53 72 2.118 0.2429 0.2429 0.4773 0.4773
2020-21 — EHL 35 3 8 11 0.314 0.0726 0.0726 0.1538 0.1538
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 King's D3 MAC SR 10 1 0 1 0.100
2023-24 King's D3 MAC JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 King's D3 MAC SO 14 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 King's D3 MAC FR 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2021-22 · King's
+163.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25982
Forward overall
#1254
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western New England · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.