← New Search ↗ Social Card

Holden Doggett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Oakville Blades OJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Oakville Blades OJHL 41 7 15 22 0.537 0.1315 0.1334 0.3694 0.3747
2019-20 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 51 12 42 54 1.059 0.2595 0.2595 0.7290 0.7290
2020-21 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 28 3 7 10 0.357
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 23 7 4 11 0.478
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 25 1 6 7 0.280
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 18 0 2 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2021-22 · Norwich
-2.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21082
Forward overall
#965
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.