IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Benjamin Meisinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHLP 43 14 21 35 0.814 0.0934 0.0967 0.1835 0.1900
2018-19 WB/Scranton Knights EHL 28 3 7 10 0.357 0.0825 0.0861 0.1747 0.1823
2019-20 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 41 13 7 20 0.488 0.1127 0.1127 0.2387 0.2387
2020-21 — EHL 36 9 9 18 0.500 0.1155 0.1155 0.2447 0.2447
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 1 0 1 1 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2021-22 · Framingham State
+1193.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34753
Forward overall
#1812
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Nelson
Johnson & Wales · 2019-20
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry Molson
Colby · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Olivier Lacroix
Salem State · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.