← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Candia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 42 4 3 7 0.167 0.0219 0.0226 0.0566 0.0583
2018-19 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 42 7 12 19 0.452 0.1045 0.1042 0.2213 0.2208
2019-20 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 46 16 20 36 0.783 0.1808 0.1808 0.3828 0.3828
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2021-22 · Westfield State
+133.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31158
Forward overall
#1671
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.