IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Goloubef Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-11-30 Country: Canada
2008 · Round 2, Pick #37  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 King Rebellion OJHL 42 9 29 38 0.905 0.2218 0.2511 0.6230 0.7052
2006-07 Oakville Blades OJHL 9 5 5 10 1.111 0.2723 0.2946 0.7650 0.8276
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 42 3 11 14 0.333
2008-09 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 36 5 8 13 0.361
2007-08 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 40 4 6 10 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2007-08 · Wisconsin
-4.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3897
Defenseman overall
#641
Defenseman born in 1989
#700
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Mark Friedman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Corey Schueneman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Hovanec
Lebanon Valley · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.