IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Minns Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 56 20 42 62 1.107 0.1885 0.1938 0.4692 0.4825
2019-20 — OJHL 35 5 18 23 0.657 0.1611 0.1611 0.4523 0.4523
2020-21 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 17 8 22 30 1.765 0.3005 0.3005 0.7479 0.7479
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 2 1 0 1 0.500
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11171
Forward overall
#471
Forward born in 2000
#20
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Patterson
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Simpson
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curtis Carlson
Nichols · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.