← New Search ↗ Social Card

Domenic Monardo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-10-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 12 11 23 0.479 0.1175 0.1263 0.3280 0.3524
2006-07 Oakville Blades OJHL 44 14 20 34 0.773 0.1894 0.1940 0.5289 0.5418
2007-08 Oakville Blades OJHL 14 8 9 17 1.214 0.2976 0.2914 0.8312 0.8139
2008-09 Aurora Tigers OJHL 49 39 40 79 1.612 0.3952 0.3667 1.1036 1.0240
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Lake Superior State D1 SR 39 20 11 31 0.795
2011-12 Lake Superior State D1 JR 39 11 18 29 0.744
2010-11 Lake Superior State D1 SO 39 12 17 29 0.744
2009-10 Lake Superior State D1 FR 36 6 6 12 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2009-10 · Lake Superior State
+15.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9314
Forward overall
#368
Forward born in 1988
#161
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.