| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Collingwood Blues | OJHL | 48 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 0.479 | 0.1175 | 0.1263 | 0.3280 | 0.3524 |
| 2006-07 | Oakville Blades | OJHL | 44 | 14 | 20 | 34 | 0.773 | 0.1894 | 0.1940 | 0.5289 | 0.5418 |
| 2007-08 | Oakville Blades | OJHL | 14 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 1.214 | 0.2976 | 0.2914 | 0.8312 | 0.8139 |
| 2008-09 | Aurora Tigers | OJHL | 49 | 39 | 40 | 79 | 1.612 | 0.3952 | 0.3667 | 1.1036 | 1.0240 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Lake Superior State | D1 | — | SR | 39 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 0.795 |
| 2011-12 | Lake Superior State | D1 | — | JR | 39 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 0.744 |
| 2010-11 | Lake Superior State | D1 | — | SO | 39 | 12 | 17 | 29 | 0.744 |
| 2009-10 | Lake Superior State | D1 | — | FR | 36 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.333 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.