IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Myers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 47 13 13 26 0.553 0.2255 0.2300 0.4447 0.4535
2019-20 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 45 15 22 37 0.822 0.3352 0.3352 0.6609 0.6609
2020-21 — NCDC 24 3 12 15 0.625 0.2548 0.2548 0.5024 0.5024
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC — 4 0 4 4 1.000
2021-22 University of New England D3 CNE — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8766
Forward overall
#378
Forward born in 2000
#219
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Kennedy
Elmira · 2017-18
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2004-05
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Ford
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.