IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gordon Cummings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 29 5 6 11 0.379 0.0496 0.0511 0.1287 0.1326
2019-20 East Coast Wizards EHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0154 0.0154 0.0326 0.0326
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 28 3 6 9 0.321 0.0420 0.0420 0.1091 0.1091
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
90%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48831
Forward overall
#2828
Forward born in 2000
#5128
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Guvenal
Concordia · 2021-22
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Berg
Nichols · 2021-22
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Miglia
Finlandia · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.