← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Lynch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Nepean Raiders CCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Kemptville 73's CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 CCHL 54 2 6 8 0.148 0.0473 0.0429 0.1146 0.1039
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 27 8 15 23 0.852
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 29 7 20 27 0.931
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 30 8 18 26 0.867
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 27 4 13 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2022-23 · Southern New Hampshire
+1615.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57978
Forward overall
#3641
Forward born in 2001
#2294
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2007-08
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.118 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.