IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 38 4 6 10 0.263 0.0669 0.0649 0.1092 0.1059
2007-08 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 43 5 9 14 0.326 0.0828 0.0755 0.1351 0.1232
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Becker D3 — SR 24 2 0 2 0.083
2010-11 Becker D3 — JR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2009-10 Becker D3 — SO 25 11 6 17 0.680
2008-09 Becker D3 — FR 22 3 4 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2008-09 · Becker
+421.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#51754
Forward overall
#1705
Forward born in 1987
#1401
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Trapp
Hamline · 2016-17
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
John Hallard
Aurora · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Ryan
Salve Regina · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.