IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 38 4 6 10 0.263 0.0440 0.0427 0.1096 0.1063
2007-08 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 43 5 9 14 0.326 0.0544 0.0496 0.1355 0.1236
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Becker D3 — SR 24 2 0 2 0.083
2010-11 Becker D3 — JR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2009-10 Becker D3 — SO 25 11 6 17 0.680
2008-09 Becker D3 — FR 22 3 4 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2008-09 · Becker
+693.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#53153
Forward overall
#1764
Forward born in 1987
#1344
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Hallard
Aurora · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trace Jablin
Endicott · 2014-15
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Trapp
Hamline · 2016-17
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.