IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trace Jablin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 48 21 20 41 0.854 0.1072 0.1128 0.2697 0.2838
2012-13 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 15 1 0 1 0.067 0.0245 0.0251 0.0704 0.0722
2013-14 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 59 8 6 14 0.237 0.0872 0.0850 0.2505 0.2442
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 48 8 12 20 0.417 0.1170 0.1103 0.3426 0.3228
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE — 10 0 3 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2015-16 · Endicott
+249.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#49065
Forward overall
#2039
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Robertson
Suffolk · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Gori
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Hamming
Hamilton · 2023-24
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.