IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Myers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New York Apple Core EHL 37 10 11 21 0.568 0.0831 0.0831 0.2780 0.2780
2021-22 New York Apple Core EHL 45 8 12 20 0.444 0.0651 0.0679 0.2177 0.2272
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 31 6 7 13 0.419
2024-25 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 29 3 5 8 0.276
2023-24 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 8 0 1 1 0.125
2022-23 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 26 5 5 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Saint Anselm
+562.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32478
Forward overall
#1927
Forward born in 2002
#1112
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Manoukian
Endicott · 2017-18
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Koepplinger
Lawrence · 2013-14
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Jackson
Norwich · 2014-15
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.