← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 27 0 1 1 0.037 0.0071 0.0071 0.0169 0.0169
2019-20 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 26 0 6 6 0.231 0.0445 0.0445 0.1056 0.1056
2020-21 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 45 0 12 12 0.267 0.0390 0.0385 0.1308 0.1290
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 23 1 5 6 0.261
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 26 2 7 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Wentworth
+796.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22956
Defenseman overall
#3304
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.