← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Larkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0268 0.0268 0.0612 0.0612
2020-21 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 32 11 11 22 0.688 0.0925 0.0925 0.2340 0.2340
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 34 8 13 21 0.618 0.0831 0.0768 0.2102 0.1943
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 16 9 6 15 0.938
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 21 4 8 12 0.571
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 22 2 8 10 0.455
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 23 2 6 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Framingham State
+429.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41524
Forward overall
#1893
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2015-16
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.