IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Throndson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 NMH NE-Prep 30 3 9 12 0.400 0.0804 0.0804 0.1829 0.1829
2019-20 NMH NE-Prep 28 1 16 17 0.607 0.1221 0.1221 0.2776 0.2776
2020-21 — NCDC 35 0 6 6 0.171 0.0699 0.0699 0.1372 0.1372
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club NCDC 45 3 17 20 0.444 0.1812 0.1704 0.3556 0.3345
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 18 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 24 0 6 6 0.250
2023-24 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2022-23 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 24 1 7 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Tufts
+133.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7294
Defenseman overall
#1567
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Brockman
Aurora · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Watchorn
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cade Helmer
University of New England · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.