IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Meinecke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Andover NE-Prep 29 4 8 12 0.414 0.0794 0.0794 0.1885 0.1885
2019-20 — NCDC 45 1 3 4 0.089 0.0205 0.0205 0.0716 0.0716
2020-21 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 32 1 9 10 0.312 0.0457 0.0457 0.1531 0.1531
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 41 1 4 5 0.122 0.0179 0.0170 0.0598 0.0567
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 26 2 4 6 0.231
2024-25 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 23 0 2 2 0.087
2023-24 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 25 0 3 3 0.120
2022-23 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 27 0 8 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · Nazareth
+648.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23044
Defenseman overall
#3304
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Walters
Plymouth State · 2009-10
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Rennert
Castleton · 2017-18
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Gunning
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.