← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Crist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Milton Academy NE-Prep 21 7 11 18 0.857 0.1653 0.1653 0.3922 0.3922
2019-20 Milton Academy NE-Prep 29 6 5 11 0.379 0.0732 0.0732 0.1736 0.1736
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 38 11 10 21 0.553 0.1277 0.1277 0.4468 0.4468
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 48 29 19 48 1.000 0.2311 0.2209 0.8086 0.7728
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 24 5 5 10 0.417
2024-25 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2023-24 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 19 4 8 12 0.632
2022-23 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 25 4 2 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · Colby
+73.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10027
Forward overall
#425
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.