IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Joslin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 29 8 13 21 0.724 0.1434 0.1434 0.3299 0.3299
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 28 7 17 24 0.857 0.1698 0.1698 0.3905 0.3905
2021-22 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 21 8 10 18 0.857 0.1121 0.1094 0.2909 0.2838
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 19 2 2 4 0.210
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 25 5 4 9 0.360
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 19 2 4 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Babson
+176.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20979
Forward overall
#1126
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Simson
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Sutliffe
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Eberhardt
Franklin Pierce · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.