← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Joslin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 29 8 13 21 0.724 0.2043 0.2043 0.3313 0.3313
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 28 7 17 24 0.857 0.2418 0.2418 0.3922 0.3922
2021-22 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 21 8 10 18 0.857 0.2825 0.2756 0.2916 0.2845
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 19 2 2 4 0.210
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 25 5 4 9 0.360
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 19 2 4 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Babson
+40.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20928
Forward overall
#1140
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2007-08
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.