IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Parody Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 39 9 15 24 0.615 0.2509 0.2448 0.4947 0.4827
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 41 3 9 12 0.293 0.1193 0.1096 0.2353 0.2162
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Elmira D3 UCHC — 25 2 4 6 0.240
2021-22 Canisius D1 AHA JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Canisius D1 AHA SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Canisius D1 AHA FR 17 0 1 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2019-20 · Canisius
-61.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4232
Defenseman overall
#974
Defenseman born in 1998
#692
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Gwatkin
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Altman
Western New England · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Johns
Chatham · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.