IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drake Semrad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-09-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 South Shore Kings NCDC 45 3 4 7 0.156 0.0360 0.0360 0.1254 0.1254
2020-21 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 17 8 20 28 1.647 0.1858 0.1858 0.5592 0.5592
2021-22 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 44 15 18 33 0.750 0.0846 0.0804 0.2546 0.2421
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 5 6 11 0.423
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 22 2 5 7 0.318
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 23 1 4 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · SUNY Oswego
+186.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3124
Defenseman overall
#730
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Chuckran
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Thieda
Norwich · 2010-11
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Pew
Neumann · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.