← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathieu Parent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 CCHL 57 5 10 15 0.263 0.0571 0.0571 0.2037 0.2037
2020-21 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 55 17 26 43 0.782 0.1696 0.1560 0.6052 0.5566
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 24 4 14 18 0.750
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 23 2 7 9 0.391
2022-23 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 22 0 6 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · SUNY Potsdam
+104.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31083
Forward overall
#1650
Forward born in 2001
#692
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2015-16
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.