IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ziv Deener-Chodirker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rivers School NE-Prep 30 4 3 7 0.233 0.0462 0.0462 0.1063 0.1063
2019-20 Rivers School NE-Prep 26 1 4 5 0.192 0.0381 0.0381 0.0876 0.0876
2021-22 Rivers School NE-Prep 23 6 18 24 1.044 0.2067 0.2067 0.4754 0.4754
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 23 1 0 1 0.043
2024-25 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2023-24 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 12 1 0 1 0.083
2022-23 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 25 2 3 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Williams
+67.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33574
Forward overall
#2045
Forward born in 2003
#492
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Keizer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2008-09
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Shell
Hobart · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eoin Reager
Post · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.