IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Damon Dulac Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 North Yarmouth NE-Prep 30 1 1 2 0.067 0.0134 0.0134 0.0305 0.0305
2019-20 North Yarmouth NE-Prep 32 2 3 5 0.156 0.0314 0.0314 0.0714 0.0714
2020-21 — EHL 32 14 8 22 0.688 0.1588 0.1588 0.3363 0.3363
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 46 23 17 40 0.870 0.2009 0.1965 0.4254 0.4161
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast — 9 0 1 1 0.111
2022-23 Nichols D3 CNE — 24 3 1 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Nichols
+49.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25499
Forward overall
#1295
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonas Oesterle
Framingham State · 2024-25
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carmine Taffo
Trine · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Manning
Saint Anselm · 2023-24
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.