IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 39 15 29 44 1.128 0.0733 0.0733 0.2541 0.2541
2020-21 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 9 1 3 4 0.444 0.0650 0.0650 0.2179 0.2179
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 31 4 3 7 0.226 0.0330 0.0321 0.1107 0.1076
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 SR 28 2 2 4 0.143
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 JR 26 3 4 7 0.269
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 SO 25 1 2 3 0.120
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 FR 29 2 2 4 0.138
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Post
+401.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39566
Forward overall
#2204
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Carlson
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Rowe
Lebanon Valley · 2004-05
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Esselman
Concordia (WI) · 2016-17
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.