IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Carlson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-06-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Portage Terriers MJHL 57 8 10 18 0.316 0.0608 0.0602 0.1990 0.1969
2014-15 Winkler Flyers MJHL 59 4 15 19 0.322 0.0620 0.0581 0.2029 0.1903
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fredonia D1 — SR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2018-19 Fredonia D3 — SR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2017-18 Fredonia D3 — JR 12 1 0 1 0.083
2016-17 Fredonia D3 — SO 19 2 3 5 0.263
2015-16 Fredonia D3 — FR 21 2 5 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2015-16 · Fredonia
+499.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19139
Defenseman overall
#2050
Defenseman born in 1994
#1464
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Manlow
New England College · 2011-12
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Hutchinson
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Guay
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2004-05
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.