IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Manlow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 58 6 4 10 0.172 0.0664 0.0683 0.2512 0.2583
2010-11 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 59 9 8 17 0.288 0.1110 0.1089 0.4198 0.4120
2011-12 Winkler Flyers MJHL 62 23 19 42 0.677 0.1304 0.1226 0.4269 0.4013
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 26 13 13 26 1.000
2014-15 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 21 6 7 13 0.619
2013-14 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 25 15 6 21 0.840
2012-13 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 25 4 3 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2012-13 · New England College
+179.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39903
Forward overall
#1387
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Bourne
Fredonia · 2011-12
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Rimbach
St. Olaf · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick DeVito
SUNY Morrisville · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.