← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Sibold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 27 1 5 6 0.222 0.0627 0.0627 0.1017 0.1017
2020-21 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 6 4 4 8 1.333 0.3761 0.3761 0.6101 0.6101
2021-22 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 24 9 13 22 0.917 0.2586 0.2586 0.4195 0.4195
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 21 1 4 5 0.238
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 11 0 4 4 0.364
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 11 1 3 4 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · Babson
+39.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31752
Forward overall
#1896
Forward born in 2003
#446
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.