IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 29 0 4 4 0.138 0.0202 0.0202 0.0676 0.0676
2021-22 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 39 2 22 24 0.615 0.0900 0.0867 0.3017 0.2907
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alvernia D3 MAC SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2024-25 Alvernia D3 MAC JR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC SO 22 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Alvernia D3 MAC FR 12 1 3 4 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Alvernia
+307.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10882
Defenseman overall
#2026
Defenseman born in 2001
#1416
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cameron Shorrock
Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Zalewski
Buffalo State · 2001-02
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Homitz
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.