IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Marottolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Berkshire School NE-Prep 28 4 0 4 0.143 0.0276 0.0276 0.0654 0.0654
2019-20 Berkshire School NE-Prep 30 4 3 7 0.233 0.0450 0.0450 0.1068 0.1068
2021-22 South Shore Kings NCDC 36 3 3 6 0.167 0.0385 0.0381 0.1348 0.1334
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 24 3 2 5 0.208
2023-24 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 16 3 1 4 0.250
2022-23 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 18 1 3 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · Wesleyan
+534.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52606
Forward overall
#3448
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Haak
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Björkman
Nichols · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Mallaro
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.