IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Bernier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 36 11 27 38 1.056 0.1191 0.1191 0.3591 0.3591
2021-22 New England Wolves EHL 45 8 12 20 0.444 0.0650 0.0642 0.2179 0.2151
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 25 2 17 19 0.760
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 22 5 7 12 0.545
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 23 2 5 7 0.304
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 22 0 4 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · Framingham State
+230.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23001
Forward overall
#1137
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Krieger
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Meltzer
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Brodeen
Bethel · 2006-07
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.