IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Lee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New England Wolves EHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0209 0.0209 0.0701 0.0701
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 36 18 18 36 1.000 0.1463 0.1485 0.4903 0.4977
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 22 11 11 22 1.000 0.1463 0.1409 0.4903 0.4723
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 26 12 17 29 1.115
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE SR 25 6 11 17 0.680
2023-24 Nichols D3 CNE JR 26 4 7 11 0.423
2022-23 Nichols D3 CNE SO 14 1 2 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Nichols
+68.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11524
Forward overall
#562
Forward born in 2002
#144
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Brainin
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Valerian
New England College · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McCarthy
Hamline · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.